Methodological Signatures in Early Ethology: The Problem of Animal Subjectivity

Abstract What is the adequate terminology to talk about animal behaviour? Is referring mental or emotional states anthropomorphic and should therefore be prohibited it a necessary means provide for an description encouraged? This question was vehemently discussed in founding phase of Ethology as scientific discipline still is. multi-layered problem can grasped by using concept methodological signatures, developed Köchy et al. (2016c). It designed analyse systematically compare research approaches examining their common parameters. By works Konrad Lorenz (1903–1989) Nikolaas Tinbergen (1907–1988), this paper offers new insights both on theoretical level. Methodologically, application signatures illustrated; theoretically, principles Classic are analysed. My aim illustrate how access subjectivity addressed history analysing statements sentience. For purpose, I will first outline general discussion tension between anthropomorphism empirical adequacy. introduce my own framework before presenting analysis Lorenz’ Tinbergen’s signatures. Thereby, show deeply embedded network epistemological, ontological concepts establish key characteristics regard ethological subjectivity. Finally, shed light possibility typology examine current frameworks welfare research.